Is India Safe for Its Residents? Essay

In fact I think INDIA is the safest place to live in on earth for Indians.Yes I do agree that there is terror of act of terrorism but then u collect to firmly fight againstit. U digest run off ur responsibilities by formula that India is not a safe place. Toh.. do u think that settling humble in foreign tush practise u feel secure If u think so ur definitely aggrieve Are Indians safe in a country like AUSTRALIA,infact Indians ar insultedthere and where eer we go and what ever we do..there is null that equals our mother and mother land. violence and problems maybe a trouble for us ..but i think there allow be no placewith prohibited problems . what we need to do is justto manage ourselves any ways to meaning it up..INDIA IS THE SUPERIOR,THE SUPREME AND THE HEAVEN FOR INDIANS. right______________________________________In India there has been lack of policy-making will and assertive decision making to come such fugitives to justice. B bely a month later, with the Delh i blasts this weekend, the NSA might sire to revise his primitively estimate his claimssound meaningless. Jammu and Kashmir is facing unrest. The Northeast is unsettled.West Bengal andTelangana are simmering, over 160 districts in 13 states are in the grip of left-hand(a) wing extremism. While the crime station is growing, abductions and extortions have nigh generate an industry. The rangdari and supari enculturation is now a new brandof terror to the Indian citizen.Money laundering, hawala, small arms proliferation and human beings trafficking are on the rise. The debate on countering these natural threats, however,has been overwhelmed by politics, rather than stop action.While India seems tobe safe are Indians secure? Or are we on course to a functional anarchy? Indias genuine crisis of intimate protective cover measure has been a bushel particularly since December 2001.When terrorists assaulted Parliament, they struck at Indias nerve centre a qualitatively differe nt target and at variance with Indias previous subsist with multiple threats of insurgencies, terrorism, left wing extremism, narcotizing trafficking, religious fundamentalism and subnationalism. The Indian security apparatus and elite are largely indifferent, or have shied away from formulating an internal security doctrine. there has been no serious stress to institutionalise a mechanism, direction or assertive policy to trade with internal threats interim, ad hoc and incremental means have been the favoured methods adopted by successive governments. There is virtually no means to pin down coherentlythe enemy within. The continuous assault on Indian citizens and their psyche has shown clearly that the security apparatus has failed to plug the reocurrence of terrorist attacks.The intelligence community gropes in the dark about the real strength, source, capacity and logistics of the enemys conterminous attack.With our domestic security apparatus button so horribly awry w e can take it for granted that we will almost never apprehend the killers. Worse, these terror attacks and militance are seen as merely a law andorder concern and treated as subject of state, whenever, political violence on a massive scale breaks out in a state, the police become the first responders. The police in India are trained, equipped and mentally conditioned to deal only with civil disorders.When confronted with serious threats to internal securitylike terrorism, insurgency and other proxy contend situations, they find it difficult to respond effectively. In such a situation, the state seeks the expertness of paramilitary forces.Creation of fast drop behind courts to avoid judicial delay and portraiture of a deterrent anti-terror law would exemplify an essential step forward. The need of the mo is toinstitutionalise, develop procedures and processesthat would boost inter institutional co-ordination, facilitate professional conduct of operations on athorough, professio nal policy analysis. privation of professional mindset for informed debate, untrained expression of spite, bitterness and mutual political acrimony take place rather of constructive policy discussions